SynthesisBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Iliac vein stenting outcomes in non-thrombotic and thrombotic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes Following Iliac Vein Stenting for Non-Thrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions-A Narrative Review Based on Large Sample Studies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iliac vein stenting (IVS) is an endovascular revascularization procedure for iliac venous outflow obstruction. We aimed to synthesize the efficacy and safety of IVS across iliac vein disease phenotypes and follow-up horizons. Following a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42024606701), we systematically searched Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on October 5, 2024. Without restricting study design, we included English-language reports with at least 10 patients that reported at least one prespecified outcome (or convertible data) and excluded studies with additional core therapies or duplicated cohorts. Diseases were classified as non-thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome (NIVCS), post iliac vein thrombotic syndrome (PIVTS), chronic iliac vein obstruction (CIVO, that is, NIVCS or PIVTS), and acute thrombotic iliac vein obstruction (ATIVO, that is, a CIVO patient with acute ipsilateral thrombosis). The primary outcome was cumulative primary patency (CPP); secondary outcomes comprised ulcer healing, edema and pain relief, quality-of-life improvement, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score change, and adverse events. CPPs at prespecified intervals were extracted for each disease category and pooled in separate meta-analyses. Twenty-seven studies (4,782 patients) were included; demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were systematically abstracted. Pooled CPPs were consistently high, particularly for NIVCS, and were lower when thrombotic components were present (PIVTS and ATIVO), while other efficacy outcomes generally improved and serious complications were uncommon. In conclusion, across diverse iliac vein diseases and follow-up periods, IVS demonstrates good efficacy and safety; this unfunded study supports IVS as a prominent treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.