ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2025
Challenges of early detection of pancreatic cancer.
Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome-based diagnostic biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and translational challenges (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Multidimensional 5-hydroxymethylcytosine features in cell-free DNA enable the detection, staging and subtyping of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Biomarker research · 2026Article
- A Clinical Score to Identify Individuals at High Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in the General Population.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- MRI-Derived Pancreatic Fat Fraction Is Independently Associated with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: A Case-Control Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Peptides as integrative modulators for clinical prognosis and targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Malpractice claims for pancreatic cancer in Norway: claim-rates, injury domains, claim outcomes and indemnity compensation.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Surveillance for Pancreatic Cancer: Knowledge, Motivations, Barriers, and Preferences Among High-Risk Individuals and Underserved Populations.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a devastating disease, due in part to its diagnosis frequently being made at an advanced stage. Ongoing efforts are aimed at identifying early-stage PC in high-risk individuals, as early detection leads to downstaging of PC and improvements in survival. However, there are a myriad of challenges that arise when trying to optimize PC early detection strategies, including selection of the appropriate high-risk individuals and selection of the test or combination of tests that should be performed. Here, we discuss the populations that are the strongest candidates for PC screening and review professional PC screening guidelines. We also summarize the current state of imaging techniques for early detection of PC and further review many studied biomarkers - ranging from nucleic acid targets, proteins, and the microbiome - to highlight the current state of the field and the challenges that remain in the years to come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.