Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Rens van de SchootDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7736-2091
Bruno Messina CoimbraDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tale EvenhuisResearch Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-2987-7985
Peter LombaersDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8780-9376
Felix WeijdemaUtrecht University Library, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5150-1102
Laurens de BruinDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-5452-3327
Rutger NeelemanDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-3824-8727
Elizabeth GrandfieldDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3188-4086
Marit SijbrandijDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5430-9810
Jelle Jasper TeijemaDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9282-4311
Elena JalsovecDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-7315-5494
Michiel Pieter BronDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4823-6085
Sonja WinterStatistics, Measurement, and Evaluation in Education, Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, College of Education and Human Development, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2203-002X
Jonathan de BruinDepartment of Research and Data Management Services, Information Technology Services, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4297-0502
Mirjam van ZuidenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1225-2702
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Artificial IntelligenceInformation Storage and RetrievalStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansartificial intelligencegran modelo de lenguajelarge language modelMeta-analysispost-traumatic stress disorderpriorización del cribadoRevisión sistemáticascreening prioritisationtrastorno de estrés postraumático
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The hunt for the last relevant paper: blending the best of humans and AI. · full record | OpenQuestion