Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090187›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Dynamic proton arc treatment planning study for oesophageal cancer.

Macarena Chocan Vera, Anne-Catherine Wéra, Hamdiye Ozan, Erik Engwall, Viktor Wase, Otte Marthin, Johan Sundström, Sophie Wuyckens, Karin Haustermans, Ana M Barragán-Montero and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Macarena Chocan VeraUCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
Anne-Catherine WéraUCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
Hamdiye OzanUCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
Erik EngwallRaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden.
Viktor WaseRaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden.
Otte MarthinRaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan SundströmRaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sophie WuyckensUCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
Karin HaustermansKULeuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of experimental radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium.
Ana M Barragán-MonteroUCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
Kevin SourisUCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
John A LeeUCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
Edmond SterpinUCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particle Arc Therapy (PAT) is considered a promising technique to improve conformity and reduce toxicities. Robustly optimized PAT plans were evaluated versus Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) for oesophageal cancer in 17 patients. Impact of motion, setup and range uncertainties on target coverage, plan quality and Organs At Risk (OAR) doses were assessed. PAT (two 80°-200°arcs) reduced OAR doses (spinal canal

Indexed as

OesophagusProton arc therapyProton therapy planningRobustness

Identifiers

PMID41090187
PMCPMC12517070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.