ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Prevalence of fundamental movement skill mastery in school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic review.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This systematic review aimed to summarise worldwide levels of fundamental movement skills (FMS) mastery in children and adolescents according to their age and sex. Methods: Studies were identified by searching three electronic databases (Medline, Scopus and Web of Science). The final search included literature up to 28 December 2023. Only studies assessing FMS mastery in typically developing children or adolescents using process-oriented tools were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. The results of studies were quantitatively summarised, and weighted means of mastery levels were calculated based on age and sex. Results: 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data from 22 595 subjects across 10 different countries. FMS mastery generally increases with age, although different FMS develop at different rates. In terms of sex, males demonstrated higher mastery in most object-control skills, while females outperformed males in all stability skills and certain locomotor skills. Discussion: These findings provide valuable insights into age-related trends and sex differences in FMS development among children and adolescents. It seems that many children worldwide do not achieve mastery in most FMS during childhood. Regular FMS assessments are crucial to identify development delays and to design appropriate interventions. Moreover, there appear to be specific ages at which developing targeted interventions for certain FMS is more critical, as mastery of these skills is more readily attainable. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023404061.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.