Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090092›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Mulching influences pear yield and quality by changing rhizosphere microbial community structure in the arid region of Northwest China.

Hongxu Li, Peigen Li, Gang Cao, Mingxin Zhao, Zhiyi Zhu, Yanwei Ma, Wei Wang, Sufang Cao, Yangchun Xu, Caixia Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongxu LiInstitute of Fruit and Floriculture Research, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Peigen LiJiangsu provincial key lab for solid organic waste utilization, Key lab of organic-based fertilizers of China, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Wastes, Educational Ministry Engineering Center of Resource-saving fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Gang CaoInstitute of Fruit and Floriculture Research, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Mingxin ZhaoInstitute of Fruit and Floriculture Research, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Zhiyi ZhuJiangsu provincial key lab for solid organic waste utilization, Key lab of organic-based fertilizers of China, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Wastes, Educational Ministry Engineering Center of Resource-saving fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Yanwei MaJiangsu provincial key lab for solid organic waste utilization, Key lab of organic-based fertilizers of China, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Wastes, Educational Ministry Engineering Center of Resource-saving fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Wei WangInstitute of Fruit and Floriculture Research, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Sufang CaoInstitute of Fruit and Floriculture Research, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yangchun XuJiangsu provincial key lab for solid organic waste utilization, Key lab of organic-based fertilizers of China, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Wastes, Educational Ministry Engineering Center of Resource-saving fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Caixia DongJiangsu provincial key lab for solid organic waste utilization, Key lab of organic-based fertilizers of China, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Wastes, Educational Ministry Engineering Center of Resource-saving fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mulching is widely adopted in pear orchards to improve soil quality and fruit production, yet its effects on rhizosphere microbial communities and the mechanisms linking soil-microbe interactions to pear yield and quality remain poorly understood. Methods: A field experiment was conducted in a pear orchard located in the arid region of Northwest China. Three treatments were applied: no mulching (CK), plastic film mulching (FM), and straw mulching (SM). Soil physicochemical properties were analyzed, and rhizosphere microbial community characteristics were assessed using high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA and ITS. Network analysis and multivariate statistical approaches were employed to explore microbial community structure, ecological modules, and their relationships with soil properties and fruit traits. Results: Both FM and SM significantly improved pear yield and fruit quality compared with CK. Principal coordinate analysis showed that mulching significantly altered soil microbial community structure. Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria dominated the bacterial community, while Ascomycota was the predominant fungal phylum. FM increased the abundance of Gram-negative bacteria and reduced Gram-positive groups. Network analysis indicated that FM enhanced ecological modules enriched in indicator species positively correlated with yield and sugar/acid ratio. Soil moisture, nutrient content, and organic matter were identified as major drivers of yield and fruit quality. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that mulching improves pear yield and quality by modifying soil properties and rhizosphere microbial networks. Plastic film mulching was more effective than straw mulching, further enhancing fruit production by improving soil nutrient content, moisture, and microbial community composition, including the recruitment of functional microbes.

Indexed as

drip irrigationindicator speciespearprincipal coordinate analysissugar/acid ratio

Identifiers

PMID41090092
PMCPMC12515920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.