Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Spectrum of care approach to animal shelter management of feline infectious peritonitis complicated by feline leukemia virus.

Emma K LaVigne, Nicole E Levy, Alexis R Bardzinski, Federica Scaletti, Kevin Horecka, Mia K Cuccinello, Dana M Moore, Julie K Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma K LaVigneSmall Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Nicole E LevyAustin Pets Alive!, Austin, TX, United States.
Alexis R BardzinskiAustin Pets Alive!, Austin, TX, United States.
Federica ScalettiTheraPet Research and Consulting LLC, Austin, TX, United States.
Kevin HoreckaResearch Department, American Pets Alive!, Austin, TX, United States.
Mia K CuccinelloShelter Medicine Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Dana M MooreShelter Medicine Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Julie K LevyShelter Medicine Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) occurs most commonly in multi-cat environments such as animal shelters. FIP is often suspected based on compatible history, signalment, physical examination, and hematological and biochemical findings. Increased diagnostic certainty requires additional diagnostic imaging and laboratory testing that may be out of reach for resource-poor caregivers and organizations. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate response to GS-441524 (GS) therapy of cats diagnosed with FIP using a spectrum of care approach relying on physical examination, hematology, biochemistry, and Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV) antigen at a shelter specializing in the adoption of cats with FeLV. Methods: The FIP treatment protocol included treatment with GS for 84 days, followed by observation for 84 days. Starting dosage, dose adjustment, route of administration, and treatment extensions were based on initial condition and response to therapy. Hematology and biochemistry panels were performed at baseline, treatment, and post-treatment observation periods. Response to treatment and survival times were compared between FeLV-positive and FeLV-negative cats. Results: A total of 170 cats diagnosed with FIP (104 FeLV-positive; 66 FeLV-negative) were included in the study. Hematology and serum chemistry abnormalities and their resolution during treatment were not significantly different between the groups, nor were there significant differences in survival through the treatment period (79% vs. 76%) or observation period (74% vs. 74%) between FeLV-positive and FeLV-negative cats respectively. Most mortality (55%) occurred in the first 7 days; cats surviving >7 days had an 86% survival rate. Despite equivalent responses to GS treatment, the FeLV-positive group experienced progressive mortality following the observation period. Survival of FeLV-positive cats (median 524 days, range 1-1585 days) was significantly shorter than for FeLV-negative cats (median not reached, range 0-1424 days) ( Discussion: The spectrum of care diagnostic approach appeared to be sufficient and preserved resources for the successful treatment of shelter cats. FeLV-positive cats achieved equivalent FIP remission rates to FeLV-negative cats but were still at risk for shortened lifespan associated with FeLV infection.

Indexed as

animal sheltercatsfeline infectious peritonitisfeline leukemia virusFeLVFIPGS-441524spectrum of care

Identifiers

PMID41090071
PMCPMC12516707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.