ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025
SURGICAL PROCEDURES PROLONG AMBULATION IN PATIENTS WITH DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical procedures on maintaining ambulation for Duchenne patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 35 patients for whom surgery was recommended at our institution from 2012 to 2020. Results: Twenty-seven patients were operated on before gait loss, and eight after. In this study, surgical treatment allowed recovery and prolongation of gait for 38.6 months, on average. The sooner the surgery was performed, the better the results were; logistic regression analysis showed that each day of delay after gait loss decreased the chances of success by 0.2%. The optimal interval for intervention was up to 12 months after gait loss. Conclusion: Our results thus corroborate the evidence that surgical interventions are beneficial for these patients and suggest a not previously described time window for achieving better outcomes. Level of Evidence lll; Retrospective, Comparative Study of Surgical Interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.