ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025
REINFORCEMENT WITH THE LONG HEAD OF THE BICEPS TENDON IN LARGE AND MASSIVE REPAIRABLE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A PROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The treatment of large and massive rotator cuff tears remains challenging. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of reinforcement with the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in patients with large and massive repairable rotator cuff tears. Methods: This is a prospective case series involving 25 patients who underwent open repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears with LHBT reinforcement. All patients were operated by the same surgeon and followed up for one year. Results: Pain scores (VAS: 6.6 ± 2.30 vs. 2.68 ± 2.73; p<0.001) and function scores (ASES: 36.86 ± 19.27 vs. 73.96 ± 23.73; p<0.001; UCLA: 13.04 ± 3.83 vs. 26.04 ± 7.39; p<0.001) improved significantly postoperatively compared to preoperatively. The biceps healing rate was 84%, while the rotator cuff retear rate was 60%. No complications related to the biceps or surgical site infections were documented. Conclusion: Reinforcement with the long head of the biceps tendon in the repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears shows satisfactory clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. Level of Evidence: IV, Case Series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.