ArticleClinical case reports2025
Treatment Outcomes of Revascularization and Cervical Pulpotomy in Immature Traumatized Maxillary Incisors: A Case Report With 24 Months Follow-Up.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report compares regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) and vital pulp therapies (VPTs) in traumatized immature maxillary incisors of a 7-year-old patient. Following a bicycle accident, teeth #9 and #8 presented with crown fractures, subluxation, and negative pulp tests. Tooth #9, which had undergone discoloration, was treated 13 days after dental trauma using a revascularization procedure with a calcium-enriched mixture of cement, whereas tooth #8 underwent cervical pulpotomy with zinc oxide-eugenol after 43 days. Both were restored with composite resin. After 24 months, both teeth remained symptom-free, vital, and showed continued root development; tooth #9 achieved a complete dentinal bridge and apical closure, and tooth #8 exhibited apical narrowing and dentinal-wall thickening. Both methods were effective, but revascularization resulted in faster and more substantial root maturation. The findings of this study indicate that both treatment modalities, when applied within their respective indications, are effective options with a high likelihood of success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.