Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090035›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

From demyelination to neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis: reassessing the role of visual evoked potential P100-N145 amplitudes: a missing piece of the puzzle?

Nurhan Kaya Tutar, Nilufer Kale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nurhan Kaya TutarDepartment of Neurology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Nilufer KaleDepartment of Neurology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease with a heterogeneous clinical course, making long-term disability prediction challenging. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs), particularly amplitude-based parameters, may serve as sensitive biomarkers of neurodegeneration and functional decline undetected by conventional clinical measures. Objective: To assess the relationship between longitudinal changes in P100-N145 amplitude and concurrent Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) changes in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and the relative utility of baseline and longitudinal VEP parameters in representing disability status. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 45 MS patients (90 eyes) with available VEP and EDSS data were followed for a median period of 48 months. The primary endpoints were (1) change in EDSS score over time and (2) EDSS progression, defined as any increase in EDSS score from baseline to follow-up. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) and logistic regression were used to investigate the relationships between the VEP parameters at baseline and follow-up and EDSS progression, accounting for inter-eye correlation; partial correlation analysis assessed amplitude-EDSS change associations, controlling for age. Results: EDSS progression was observed in 17.8% of patients. A longitudinal decrease in P100-N145 amplitude from baseline to follow-up was significantly associated with EDSS progression (OR: 1.511, 95% CI, Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that a reduction in P100-N145 amplitude over time is associated with worsening disability in RRMS. This suggests that the P100-N145 may be an underestimated marker of progressive functional deterioration in RRMS.

Indexed as

disability progressionEDSSmultiple sclerosisneurodegenerationP100–N145VEP

Identifiers

PMID41090035
PMCPMC12515666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.