ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Post-discharge "continuum of care" clinical pathway for persons with severe neurodisabilities-qualitative research to assess its concept and practicality after implementation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to reflect the appropriateness and practicality of an evidence- and guideline-based clinical pathway (CP) for the intersectoral support of community-based neurorehabilitation of severely affected neurological patients requiring home-based intensive care nursing, early after its regional implementation in the Federal State of Bavaria, Germany. The CP is designed to support ongoing functional progress, with specialists from three regional neurological early rehabilitation centers (NER) providing rehabilitation expertise shared with healthcare professionals in the community across Bavaria, using a person-centered, individualized approach. Methods: Qualitative exploratory study design: Semi-structured interviews with three NER-based regional outreach teams (ROFTs), followed by a multi-stage qualitative analysis and interpretation of their responses. Results: Three group interviews were conducted with a total of 10 ROFT members. A total of 304 unique responses (i) were documented. Based on their experience, the teams reported numerous healthcare-related barrier observations ( Conclusion: Although the CP was not challenged conceptually by the field experience, the teams implementing the intersectoral collaboration faced major challenges with the continuum of care approach. Most importantly, a lack of, and variability in, qualified therapeutic resources, as well as the fact that multiprofessional team approaches were not established as a healthcare standard in the community, were noted. While the research findings support the need for a situation analysis and targeted implementation efforts, they also indicate the potential for such a hybrid collaborative center- and community-based healthcare approach for a clientele with highly specialized healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.