ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Exploring the perception of breast and gynecological malignancies (cervical and endometrial) among adult females in a rural community of Haryana: A qualitative exploration.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast and gynecological malignancies are leading contributors to cancer-related morbidity and mortality in India. Limited awareness, cultural beliefs, logistical barriers, and stigma often delay early detection and treatment, especially in rural areas. This study explores perceptions, barriers, and health-seeking behaviors regarding these malignancies among adult females in a rural Haryana community. Methodology: A qualitative study was conducted in a village in Ballabgarh block in Faridabad district of Haryana. Data were generated through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) using interview guide. Four FGDs were held with adult women, and one FGD with Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), along with four IDIs with healthcare stakeholders. All the FGDs and IDIs were audio recorded and were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed after free listing of the transcription was performed. Results: Key themes included knowledge gaps about symptoms and causes, logistical limitations in accessing treatment, and the influence of social and cultural practices. Misconceptions, such as cancers being caused by contaminated food and water or poor hygiene, were common. Family support was generally strong, but logistical challenges such as transportation, patient load, and financial constraints deterred healthcare access. Limited awareness about screening practices and symptoms of gynecological cancers was evident. Ground-level health workers such as ASHAs played a vital role in promoting awareness and mobilizing patients. Conclusion: This study highlights the critical need for community-based interventions to address knowledge gaps, destigmatize cancer, and enhance access to screening and treatment. Strengthening health systems, providing adequate resources, and involving healthcare workers can significantly improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.