ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Reflections of indian medical graduates participating in the family adoption program: A qualitative evaluation, at bundelkhand region, India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary health care consists of four principles, namely equitable distribution, community participation, intersectoral coordination, and appropriate technology. The Family Adoption Program focused on second principal community participation. Here medical students gain an experience of how the people's daily lives affect their health. This is achieved by the community medicine department through family health research and field practice. The recently mandated Family Adoption Program (FAP) presents both opportunities and challenges for all undergraduate medical students. The study intends to comprehend how different stakeholders view this program. Methods: A qualitative exploratory investigation was undertaken. The medical undergraduate and postgraduate students and involved stakeholders were specifically invited to participate. The selected participants in this study were 10 faculty (F) members, 10 postgraduates (PG), and 85 medical undergraduate (UG) students for Key Informant Interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGD) contributed qualitative inputs for thematic analysis. Results: Participants found that FAP can provide insight into patients' and their families' living conditions and encourage students to pursue their desired careers. Major obstacles comprised a lack of transportation, inadequate supply chain and logistics, as well as a staff deficit in medical colleges. Different people have different ideas, so there was disagreement on the appropriate moment to initiate the student into FAP. It was also thought crucial to gain the family's trust and cooperation, as well as to lower concerns. Faculty involvement in the field was encouraged; however, concerns were raised about there being less need for faculty in the field. Conclusions: FAP has received mixed evaluations regarding its utility and sustainable growth in the future. However, with proper motivation and supervision, it has the capability to significantly improve medical education and the lives of adopted families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.