ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Use of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies and rheumatoid factor in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in a tertiary care hospital.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disease that affects 0.5-1% of the general population and is characterized by a chronic, debilitating, and destructive form of arthritis. Rheumatoid factor (RF) is a frequently used diagnostic test for RA. Objectives: To evaluate the significance of anti-CCP and RF antibodies in RA diagnosis, to assess diagnostic utility of anti-CCP antibody for RA in relation to RF, and to assess the combined approach (anti-CCP + RF) for early prognosis of RA. Materials and Methods: 93 patients clinically suspected of RA attending Medicine OPD at ESIC (Employees State Insurance Corporation) Hospital, Bangalore, were included in the study. About 5 ml of blood was collected aseptically from clinically suspected RA patients. Serum was separated and tested for RA factor and anti-CCP antibodies. Statistical Analysis: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated using 2 × 2 table, with fixed row margins (a + b) and column margins (c + d); conventionally, disease is on top and test is on the side. Results: RA factor is positive in 12 RA patients, anti-CCP patients in 24 RA patients, combined RA and anti-CCP positive in 8 patients, sensitivity of RA factor 33.3%, anti-CCP 66.6%, and RA + Anti CCP 33.3% Specificity of RA factor 17.54%, Anti CCP 1.75%, and RA + Anti CCP 7% positive Predictive value of RA Factor 54.5%, Anti CCP 100%, and RA + Anti CCP 66.6%. Conclusions: Anti-CCP antibodies have a high sensitivity and positive predictive value, making them an excellent tool for differentiating RA from other forms of arthritis. Because of its high specificity, RF is a useful screening marker for RA diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.