ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
The utilization of government social protection schemes by people living with HIV: A cross-sectional study in Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Government Social protection schemes (GSPS) are critical to reduce the various socio-economic challenges faced by people living with HIV (PLWH). It is unclear whether the PLWH utilize the provision of these schemes to their benefit. This study was conducted to estimate the utilization of the social protection schemes by PLWH and to identify the facilitating and constraining factors in accessing the schemes. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 94 participants from three anti-retroviral therapy (ART) zones in the district by purposive sampling. The participants were interviewed for the utilization of the pre-identified schemes, including the health scheme, financial aid, nutritional aid, housing, aid for their children, and life insurance/employment. The barriers and facilitating factors were simultaneously explored by thematic analysis. Results: Utilization of the GSPS is high for health benefits ( Conclusion: Utilization of the social schemes by PLWH is quite complex. An integrated and inclusive approach to provide the GSPS is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.