Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089958›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Mapping political commitments: Analysing health priorities in Indian election manifestos.

B R Rajeev, Aswathy Ram, R Nivedhya, Shilpi S Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B R RajeevCentre for Health Systems, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Aswathy RamCentre for Health Systems, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
R NivedhyaCentral University of Kerala, India.
Shilpi S DasCentre for Commercial Determinants of Health, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Political manifestos are crucial for communicating party visions and policy priorities during elections. In the health context, manifestos provide a lens to examine political commitment to addressing structural challenges in India. Despite India's position as the largest democracy and the fourth-largest economy, the healthcare system is inequitably distributed, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. This study aims to evaluate how national political parties prioritise health in their manifestos for the 18 Methodology: Manifestos from four national parties-Indian National Congress (INC), Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP), Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) and National People's Party (NPP)-were analyzed using content and conceptual analysis. Health-related statements were categorized into five themes: nature, area, focus, prevention levels, and management. Statements not aligned with predefined categories were grouped under new areas or focuses. Each category's emphasis was quantitatively assessed by counting and summing relevant terms. Inter-coder reliability was ensured through independent coding and discussion. Results: The analysis identified one hundred and four health-related statements. INC emphasized Universal Health Coverage and workforce protection, while the BJP highlighted its achievements and program expansion. The CPI-M adopted a rights-based approach, focusing on equity and private-sector regulation. NPP presented a generalized vision, but lacked actionable strategies. Health infrastructure and traditional medicine featured across manifestos, yet governance, finance, and systemic reforms were largely neglected. Parties selectively addressed population-specific issues, with limited attention to tertiary care or research and development. Discussion: Manifestos reflected the ideological leanings but revealed a low prioritization of systemic health reforms and governance. Short-term, delivery-based solutions dominate over long-term investments. Political and electoral calculations influence the framing of health policies, perpetuating inequities, and systemic inefficiencies. Conclusion: India's political manifestos recognize health as important but fail to address systemic challenges. Greater political will and citizen engagement, is essential to elevate health as a governance priority, fostering universal health coverage and equity.

Indexed as

electionHealthmanifestopolitical parties

Identifiers

PMID41089958
PMCPMC12517580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.