ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Clinical profile and outcome in ectopic pregnancy in a teaching institution: A prospective observational study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive analysis of ectopic pregnancy outcomes among Indian women.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ruptured ectopic pregnancy is a leading cause of maternal mortality in the first trimester. Nowadays, with better diagnostic and therapeutic modalities available, the mortality due to the ruptured ectopic pregnancy has reduced, but the effect of various treatment options on subsequent fertility of women remains unclear. Hence, this study was planned to evaluate the clinical profile and outcome of various treatment options in women presenting with ectopic pregnancy. Material and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, J.N.M.C.H., Aligarh for a period of 2 years. Total 100 cases diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy were included in the study. After detailed history and clinical examination, decision of management (expectant, medical or surgical) was taken according to the hospital protocol. The patients were then followed-up throughout their treatment course. Data was analyzed by frequency, percentage, and Chi-square test. Results: Most common age group of patients with ectopic pregnancy, in our study was 20-25 years. Out of 100 patients enrolled, 82% had some underlying risk factor, most common being pelvic infection, seen in 30% cases. The classical triad of abdominal pain, amenorrhea and vaginal bleeding was present in 52 patients. Majority of patients in our study were managed by surgery i.e. 78%; 18% were treated medically and 4% underwent expectant management. Conclusion: Most of the patients with ectopic pregnancy, in our study were in early twenties with pelvic inflammatory disease being the commonest risk factor and abdominal pain as commonest symptom. Although, medical therapy offers safe and effective alternative for management of tubal ectopic, in our study most patients were managed surgically. The treatment approach depends upon clinical presentation and has impact on the future fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.