Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089940›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Neurobehavioral outcomes in pediatric smartphone users: An observational study among a cohort of school-going children from a cantonment town of West Bengal.

Gaurav Kulshrestha, Rahul Sinha, Ram Kumar Gupta, Tania Pan, Sweta Suman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaurav KulshresthaDepartment of Pediatrics, Military Hospital, Bareillly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rahul SinhaDepartment of Pediatrics, Command Hospital, Chandimandir, Panchkula, Haryana, India.
Ram Kumar GuptaDepartment of Accident and Emergency Services, Army Hospital (Research and Referral), New Delhi, India.
Tania PanDepartment of Community Medicine, Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Jamuhar, Bihar, India.
Sweta SumanDepartment of Community Medicine, Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Jamuhar, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid proliferation of smartphones and digital devices among children has raised concerns about potential neurobehavioral consequences. This study aimed to assess screen time usage patterns and their association with neurobehavioral problems among school-going children in West Bengal, India. Material and methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among 777 school-going children (270 preadolescents aged 6-9 years; 507 adolescents aged 10-18 years) from a cantonment town in West Bengal. Data were collected using structured questionnaires covering sociodemographic characteristics, screen time, and neurobehavioral assessment using the Child Behavior Checklist. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney Results: The median cumulative screen time was 7.0 h daily across both age groups, substantially exceeding recommended guidelines. Preadolescents showed significantly higher cumulative screen time (6.83 ± 2.11 vs. 6.44 ± 2.21 h, Conclusion: Excessive screen time is significantly associated with neurobehavioral problems in Indian children, with age-specific vulnerability patterns. These findings highlight an urgent need for evidence-based digital wellness guidelines and interventions to protect child mental health in the digital era.

Indexed as

Adolescentattention deficitChild Behavior Checklistcognitive dysfunctionpreadolescentscreen time

Identifiers

PMID41089940
PMCPMC12517590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.