ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Proposed Guidelines for Reporting Parameters and Procedures of High- and Low-Level Laser Therapy in Medical Research Articles.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Do Laser and Light Activation Improve In-Office Dental Bleaching Outcomes? An Umbrella Review of Efficacy, Tooth Sensitivity, and Biological Safety.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Single-Wavelength 755 nm Laser Compared to Dual-Wavelength 755 nm and 1064 nm Laser in Hair Removal: A Split-Body Design With Blinding.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Laser therapy is increasingly used in clinical medicine, ranging from high-level laser therapy (HLLT) to low-level laser therapy (LLLT). This study proposes standardized guidelines for reporting parameters and procedures of HLLT and LLLT in medical research articles, aiming to improve clarity, reproducibility, and scientific rigor in clinical reporting. Methods: The recommendations are based on insights from peer-reviewed studies that consistently identify gaps in the reporting of laser parameters and procedures. The key parameters include wavelength, power density, energy, energy density, and beam characteristics. Common issues noted are missing data, miscalculated doses, and unverified device specifications. To strengthen these recommendations, selected laser-tissue interactions were modeled using COMSOL Multiphysics. This modeling illustrates how power, spot size, and penetration depth affect treatment outcomes. Results: The analysis revealed substantial inconsistencies in the way laser parameters are reported, often compromising reproducibility and reliability. The proposed framework introduces a structured checklist to support systematic documentation of treatment protocols, covering laser settings, irradiation, and treatment parameters. Conclusion: Adopting these proposed guidelines can enhance the accuracy, transparency, and comparability of laser-based studies, filling a critical gap in current reporting practices and ultimately improving treatment validation and advancing the evidence base for HLLT and LLLT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.