ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Prediction of primary admission total charges following lumbar disc arthroplasty utilizing machine learning.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Financial Heterogeneity During Early Diagnosis-Related Group Payment Reform: A Two-Year Hospital-Based Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) is a widespread condition contributing to chronic lower back pain and impaired mobility. While spinal fusion has been the conventional treatment, it poses drawbacks including extended recovery periods and the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) has emerged as a motion-preserving alternative with the potential to mitigate these risks. This study aimed to assess how factors such as hospital size, regional location, and patient characteristics influence hospitalization charges during the initial admission for LDA. Methods: This retrospective study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 to identify patients who underwent LDA. The primary endpoint was total hospitalization charges for the initial surgical admission. Variables analyzed included demographic data, hospital attributes, and economic indicators at the regional level. Both multivariate linear regression and machine learning (ML) techniques-logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting-were applied to evaluate predictive factors for cost. A significance threshold was set at P<0.05. Results: A total of 568 patients met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 526 single-level and 42 multi-level LDA procedures. The average admission charge was $124,946, with high-cost admissions defined as those exceeding $155,770. The mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. Key predictors of increased charges included longer length of stay, treatment at large hospitals, and for-profit hospital ownership. Among the models tested, the random forest algorithm yielded the highest predictive accuracy [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) =0.836], followed by gradient boosting (AUC =0.826) and logistic regression (AUC =0.822). Conclusions: Charges associated with LDA are significantly influenced by institutional and patient-level factors. ML models effectively predicted cost variability and hold promise for informing cost-effective strategies in spine surgery. Integrating these models into clinical workflows may enhance both financial planning and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.