Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089923›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025

Prediction of primary admission total charges following lumbar disc arthroplasty utilizing machine learning.

Paul G Mastrokostas, Leonidas E Mastrokostas, Ahmed K Emara, Abigail Razi, Mena Salman, John K Houten, Kenneth K Ng, Ahmed Saleh, Jad Bou Monsef, Afshin E Razi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paul G MastrokostasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Leonidas E MastrokostasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Ahmed K EmaraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abigail RaziDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Mena SalmanSchool of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
John K HoutenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Kenneth K NgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Ahmed SalehDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Jad Bou MonsefDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Afshin E RaziDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Mitchell K NgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-055X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) is a widespread condition contributing to chronic lower back pain and impaired mobility. While spinal fusion has been the conventional treatment, it poses drawbacks including extended recovery periods and the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) has emerged as a motion-preserving alternative with the potential to mitigate these risks. This study aimed to assess how factors such as hospital size, regional location, and patient characteristics influence hospitalization charges during the initial admission for LDA. Methods: This retrospective study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 to identify patients who underwent LDA. The primary endpoint was total hospitalization charges for the initial surgical admission. Variables analyzed included demographic data, hospital attributes, and economic indicators at the regional level. Both multivariate linear regression and machine learning (ML) techniques-logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting-were applied to evaluate predictive factors for cost. A significance threshold was set at P<0.05. Results: A total of 568 patients met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 526 single-level and 42 multi-level LDA procedures. The average admission charge was $124,946, with high-cost admissions defined as those exceeding $155,770. The mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. Key predictors of increased charges included longer length of stay, treatment at large hospitals, and for-profit hospital ownership. Among the models tested, the random forest algorithm yielded the highest predictive accuracy [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) =0.836], followed by gradient boosting (AUC =0.826) and logistic regression (AUC =0.822). Conclusions: Charges associated with LDA are significantly influenced by institutional and patient-level factors. ML models effectively predicted cost variability and hold promise for informing cost-effective strategies in spine surgery. Integrating these models into clinical workflows may enhance both financial planning and patient care.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessLumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA)machine learning (ML)National Inpatient Sample (NIS)value-based care

Identifiers

PMID41089923
PMCPMC12516407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.