ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Novel autograft bone harvesting device used in 232 consecutive patients who underwent cervical or lumbar fusion: initial experience, outcome, and cost analysis in a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As healthcare becomes more expensive, hospitals and providers need to develop "value engineering" as a method to deliver the same quality of care for a lower cost. One key concept is to look at the entire cost of a procedure and begin to reduce costs one at a time within that procedure. We developed the BDC-15 as a method to harvest high quality bone graft and at a low cost while maintaining excellent results. Methods: In this study, we present the first series of patients who underwent cervical fusion and lumbar fusion using exclusively the BDC-15 without any additional allograft. Results: A total of 232 patients were entered into the study with 107 patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion surgery (one-, two-, or three-level) and 125 patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery (one- or two-level). Patients were followed for a mean of 13.4 months assessing fusion. For the cervical group, 95.3% of patients were fused at 6 months and for the lumbar group, 92% of patients were fused at 12 months. Complication rate was 4.7% (11 patients) due to admission for post-operative pain (6 patients), wound infection (3 patients), and hardware failure (2 patients). Average cost savings across all groups was $441,850 or approximately $1,904 per patient. Conclusions: Autograft results in acceptable fusion rates and patient outcomes at a fraction of the cost of Allograft.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.