Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089920›Full record

ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025

Measuring meaningful outcomes for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a narrative review and critical appraisal of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) instrument.

Armaan K Malhotra, Husain Shakil, Christopher S Lozano, Vishwathsen Karthikeyan, Jennifer A Dermott, Jefferson R Wilson, Unni G Narayanan, David E Lebel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ten-year trends of intraoperative adverse events during scoliosis surgery: insights from the British Spine Registry.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Armaan K MalhotraDivision of Neurosurgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Husain ShakilDivision of Neurosurgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher S LozanoDivision of Neurosurgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vishwathsen KarthikeyanDivision of Neurosurgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer A DermottDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jefferson R WilsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Unni G Narayanan *Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David E Lebel *Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised questionnaire (SRS-22r) is the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQL) for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Here, we seek to critically appraise the development process and psychometric properties of the SRS-22r. Methods: We evaluated the item generation, item reduction, sensibility and measurement properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness of the SRS-22r. To accomplish this, we examined available literature describing psychometric properties of the SRS-22r and summarized the findings in a narrative review format. Key Content and Findings: The SRS-22r represents a multi-dimensional outcome measure that demonstrates generally appropriate responsiveness to outcomes after surgical AIS deformity correction. Despite its strengths, several limitations were identified, including (I) absence of a conceptual framework for HRQL in AIS; (II) lack of direct patient involvement during development of the instrument; (III) minimal evidence of evaluation of the interpretation, appropriateness and importance, comprehensiveness of the items by adolescents; and (IV) the inclusion of a satisfaction with treatment (surgery) domain within a HRQL instrument. Though the SRS-22r is responsive to change after surgical intervention, its ability to discriminate between mild and moderate scoliosis remains limited. Conclusions: Our findings characterize the strengths and limitations of the SRS-22r. An ideal AIS HRQL measure should be guided by a conceptual framework informed by, and aligned with the priorities and goals of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis based on their lived experience, complemented by parental perspectives and input from clinician experts with an understanding AIS management.

Indexed as

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)outcomesreliabilityScoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS questionnaire)validity

Identifiers

PMID41089920
PMCPMC12516424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.