ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Measuring meaningful outcomes for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a narrative review and critical appraisal of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) instrument.
Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten-year trends of intraoperative adverse events during scoliosis surgery: insights from the British Spine Registry.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality of Life in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Validity, Reliability, and Clinical Utility-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrative conservative rehabilitation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled trial of traditional Chinese manual therapy combined with Schroth training.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised questionnaire (SRS-22r) is the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQL) for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Here, we seek to critically appraise the development process and psychometric properties of the SRS-22r. Methods: We evaluated the item generation, item reduction, sensibility and measurement properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness of the SRS-22r. To accomplish this, we examined available literature describing psychometric properties of the SRS-22r and summarized the findings in a narrative review format. Key Content and Findings: The SRS-22r represents a multi-dimensional outcome measure that demonstrates generally appropriate responsiveness to outcomes after surgical AIS deformity correction. Despite its strengths, several limitations were identified, including (I) absence of a conceptual framework for HRQL in AIS; (II) lack of direct patient involvement during development of the instrument; (III) minimal evidence of evaluation of the interpretation, appropriateness and importance, comprehensiveness of the items by adolescents; and (IV) the inclusion of a satisfaction with treatment (surgery) domain within a HRQL instrument. Though the SRS-22r is responsive to change after surgical intervention, its ability to discriminate between mild and moderate scoliosis remains limited. Conclusions: Our findings characterize the strengths and limitations of the SRS-22r. An ideal AIS HRQL measure should be guided by a conceptual framework informed by, and aligned with the priorities and goals of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis based on their lived experience, complemented by parental perspectives and input from clinician experts with an understanding AIS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.