Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089919›Full record

ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025

Open management of massive venous bleeding in anterior lumbar spine surgery-a narrative review.

Charlie R Faulks, Gregory M Malham, William P Bradley, Matthew H Claydon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlie R FaulksDepartment of Neurosciences, Epworth Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9362-9031
Gregory M MalhamDepartment of Neurosciences, Epworth Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7200-2211
William P BradleySchool of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Matthew H ClaydonDepartment of Neurosciences, Epworth Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Anterior lumbar spine surgery (ALSS) provides multiple benefits for the patient with spinal pathology. Vascular complications are uncommon and usually managed with simple surgical techniques and ancillary products. Rarely, confronting massive haemorrhage can occur after a venous injury which endangers the patient. We aimed to review the anatomical basis and risk factors for venous injury, propose a staged, systematic approach for management and discuss open surgical techniques, instruments, products, and strategies in detail for each of the stages. Methods: This was a narrative review. A systematic approach was used. A review of national databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Google Scholar) was performed using literature from 2000 to 2024 in English. Keywords included terms "anterior", "lumbar", "spine", "haemorrhage", "venous injury", "vascular", "repair", "ligation", "damage control", and "venous thromboembolism". Studies that aimed to describe the anatomy, risk factors, incidence, surgical techniques, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of ALSS were included. Other generalised searches, not included in the initial systematic search, were conducted and included in our narrative review. Key Content and Findings: This review considers the relevant anatomy, risk factors, patient work-up, lists possibly useful instruments and consumables, the broad stages of open management, specific operative strategies and techniques, and the post-operative management of the patient. Conclusions: Massive venous injury (MVI) in ALSS is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. Multiple open surgical techniques can be employed to control and manage the injury(s). The surgical and anaesthetic teams should have formulated a unified contingency plan against the eventuality of massive venous haemorrhage. The best outcome is only achieved with a team approach to the situation, recruitment of the necessary personnel and the deployment of the necessary equipment to enable the open management.

Indexed as

anteriorhaemorrhagelumbar spine surgeryvascular repairVenous injury

Identifiers

PMID41089919
PMCPMC12516384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.