Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089905›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025

Readability of patient education materials for lumbar disc replacement.

Anil Sedani, Eric Kholodovsky, William A Marmor, Justin Trapana, Frank Mota, Evan Trapana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anil SedaniDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-1091
Eric KholodovskyUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5542-6564
William A MarmorDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8434-2088
Justin TrapanaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1854-1898
Frank MotaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Evan TrapanaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many patients refer to internet-based patient education materials (PEMs) to learn about lumbar disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to assess the readability of PEMs on lumbar disc replacement. Methods: The Google search engine was queried with the phrase "lumbar disc replacement patient information". Readability scores were calculated for the initial 25 websites that met inclusion criteria by copying the PEM to http://www.readabilityformulas.com. SPSS version 28.0.0 was used to calculate descriptive statistics for each measure. Results: The mean average reading level was 12.08±1.73. The mean readability score for Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score was 45.60±9.16. Additional scores include Gunning Fog, 14.50±2.06; Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), 10.94±2.14; The Coleman Liau Index, 12.82±1.50; Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, 10.51±1.56; Automated Readability Index, 11.81±2.46; Linsear Write Formula, 11.08±3.49. Zero PEMs were found to be below the 6th-grade or 8th-grade reading level. Conclusions: PEM readability is a crucial part of the patient care experience, and the current readability of lumbar disc replacement PEMs is not at an acceptable level. Given their current state, PEMs can make it difficult for a sizable proportion of the general population to comprehend the nature of their medical condition and how to appropriately treat it.

Indexed as

lumbar disc replacementpatient education materials (PEMs)Readabilityspine

Identifiers

PMID41089905
PMCPMC12516368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.