ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Comparative effectiveness of lumbar interbody fusion techniques in adult scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative alignment and disability outcomes.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adulthood: Clinical Challenges and Progress During the Critical Period of Pregnancy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adult scoliosis, marked by degenerative and pathological changes in the spinal column, is a growing health concern, particularly among the elderly, often leading to chronic pain and functional limitations. Initial management typically includes conservative approaches such as physical therapy; however, persistent symptoms frequently necessitate surgical intervention. Recently, lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) techniques, including lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approaches, have gained attention as less invasive alternatives to traditional open spinal surgery. This study aims to provide a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine in the available literature to inform clinical decision-making. We hypothesize that lateral interbody fusion provides a viable surgical option with favorable reductions in postoperative Cobb angle. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to examine the outcomes of LIF in adult scoliosis patients. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were queried in January 2024 to identify relevant articles published since 2010. Articles were screened for inclusion based on predefined criteria, and data extraction was performed to collect demographic, clinical, functional, and radiographic measurements. Statistical analysis was conducted using a random effects model to assess primary outcomes of interest, including changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and Cobb angle measurements before and after LIF surgical intervention. The robvis tool was employed to create standardized visualizations of risk of bias across included studies. Results: The systematic review identified 46 articles that met the inclusion criteria, of which eight studies, encompassing a total of 424 patients, were selected for final analysis. Five of these eight studies, involving 289 patients, specifically examined outcomes for those who underwent LIF. Meta-analysis of available data revealed a statistically significant reduction in postoperative Cobb angle following LIF (mean decrease: 9.50 degrees, 95% confidence interval: -11.47 to -7.52), indicating effective deformity correction. Heterogeneity was observed across studies, likely attributed to variations in surgical techniques and measurement methods. Conclusions: LLIF demonstrates efficacy in adult scoliosis management, with favorable outcomes in terms of deformity correction and functional improvement. The minimally invasive nature of LLIF contributes to reduced surgical morbidity and accelerated recovery, underscoring its significance as an alternative to traditional open surgery of the lumbar spine. Limitations include heterogeneity present across studies, which warrant continued research to evaluate these outcomes. Nevertheless, LLIF holds promise as an effective surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.