ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Transfacet transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TF-TLIF) results in greater change in spondylolisthesis and posterior disc height compared to percutaneous TLIF (Perc-TLIF) or minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF): a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The evolution of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has resulted in the popularization of three main techniques: the minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF), the transfacet TLIF (TF-TLIF), and the percutaneous TLIF (Perc-TLIF). While MIS methods have previously been established as superior to open TLIF, there remains an unclear consensus on the utility and clinical outcomes associated with these different MIS techniques. This study aims to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between the three approaches to TLIF. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the electronic medical records of a single fellowship-trained surgeon was performed for all patients receiving a single-level Perc-TLIF, MIS-TLIF, or TF-TLIF between 2018 and 2024. Variables collected included pre-operative and post-operative radiographic measures (e.g., change in spondylolisthesis, disc height, segmental lordosis), as well as clinical outcomes (e.g., length of stay, operating time, opioid utilization, readmission rates), and data were analyzed using a multivariable regression model. Results: Ninety-four total patients undergoing TLIF surgery were identified (TF-TLIF: n=17; MIS-TLIF: n=31; Perc-TLIF: n=46). In our regression model accounting for other clinical and radiographic variables, the transfacet approach was associated with greater change in spondylolisthesis ( Conclusions: Although there are limitations, the TF-TLIF shows promising results compared to MIS-TLIF and Perc-TLIF approaches, with improved spondylolisthesis reduction and posterior disc height correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.