ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Mounting the learning curve in unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression in an Asian population: experience of a single surgeon's first 105 consecutive cases with early functional outcomes.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The benefits of minimally invasive spinal surgery have seen an increase in uptake by surgeons and an increase in acceptability by patients. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UbE) lumbar decompressive surgery with a focus on outcomes, technique, and temporal relationship between surgeon experience and operative times. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the first consecutive 105 patients undergoing UbE lumbar decompression (99 single-level and 6 double-level) for symptomatic herniated disc and/or spinal stenosis by a single surgeon at our institution. Data encompassed demographics, preoperative and postoperative assessments, operative details, complications, as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). Results: The 105 Asian patients presented with diverse symptoms, predominantly leg pain/radiculopathy (93.3%) and lower back pain (75.2%). The commonest level operated on was L4/5 (56.2%), and the operative time averaged 117.58 minutes per level, with shorter times being associated with increased surgical experience (r=-0.254, P=0.009) and longer times associated with higher body mass index (BMI) (r=0.209, P=0.03). Left-sided and L5/S1 level decompression were associated with quicker operative time, but without reaching statistical significance. In the immediate postoperative period, all patients experienced an improvement of symptoms with 54.3% experiencing complete symptomatic relief. The average length of hospitalization was 1.88 days. Complications were minimal with 3 dural tears (2.86%), 1 postoperative wound bleeding (0.95%) and no infective sequelae. PROM at 1- and 3-month mark showed significant improvements in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Conclusions: UbE lumbar decompression in Asian patients at our institution demonstrated favorable outcomes, in terms of symptomatic relief, functional scores and length of stay with few complications. Surgical times improved with increased experience, suggesting feasibility with practice. We recommend having adequate surgical experience in traditional approaches before transitioning to endoscopic decompression, and to embark on learning UbE approach with careful patient selection. Given inherent limitations such as retrospective single-cohort design and a short follow-up, further longer-term comparative studies are warranted to establish its superiority definitively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.