ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Psychiatry in the age of AI: transforming theory, practice, and medical education.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Responsible artificial intelligence integration framework for psychiatric guidelines.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Guideline
- Artificial intelligence-supported therapeutic interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- AI in Psychiatry for Improving Continuity of Patient Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- From neuroinflammation to neural inference: computational psychiatry meets precision medicine.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- AI literacy in undergraduate medical education: a competency-based interpretive framework for curriculum and assessment.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Toward Ethical Governance of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Enabled Cognitive Monitoring in Aging Populations.Cureus · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Psychological Counseling: A Narrative Review and Governance Framework.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental disorders constitute an urgent and escalating global public-health concern. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have begun to transform both psychiatric theory and clinical practice, generating unprecedented opportunities for precision diagnosis, mechanistic insight and personalized intervention. Here, we present a narrative review that examines the current landscape of AI-enhanced psychiatry, evaluates AI's capacity to refine diagnostic nosology, elucidate etiological mechanisms, formalize diagnostic criteria and optimize treatment strategies, and delineates the concomitant ethical, legal and social challenges-most notably those arising from data privacy, algorithmic bias and inequitable access to technological resources. In parallel, the review interrogates the implications of this technological inflection point for medical education. It argues that contemporary training programs must evolve through systematic curricular re-design, the incorporation of computational and data science competencies, the adoption of integrative pedagogical models that couple theoretical instruction with hands-on algorithmic practice, and the reinforcement of bioethical literacy. Only by embedding AI fluency within a robust framework of humanistic and professional values can the next generation of psychiatrists be equipped to harness algorithmic tools responsibly and to translate their outputs into clinically meaningful decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.