Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089865›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2025

Psychiatry in the age of AI: transforming theory, practice, and medical education.

Hongyan Zheng, Xizhe Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Responsible artificial intelligence integration framework for psychiatric guidelines.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hongyan ZhengKangda College, Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, China.
Xizhe ZhangEarly Intervention Unit, Department of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental disorders constitute an urgent and escalating global public-health concern. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have begun to transform both psychiatric theory and clinical practice, generating unprecedented opportunities for precision diagnosis, mechanistic insight and personalized intervention. Here, we present a narrative review that examines the current landscape of AI-enhanced psychiatry, evaluates AI's capacity to refine diagnostic nosology, elucidate etiological mechanisms, formalize diagnostic criteria and optimize treatment strategies, and delineates the concomitant ethical, legal and social challenges-most notably those arising from data privacy, algorithmic bias and inequitable access to technological resources. In parallel, the review interrogates the implications of this technological inflection point for medical education. It argues that contemporary training programs must evolve through systematic curricular re-design, the incorporation of computational and data science competencies, the adoption of integrative pedagogical models that couple theoretical instruction with hands-on algorithmic practice, and the reinforcement of bioethical literacy. Only by embedding AI fluency within a robust framework of humanistic and professional values can the next generation of psychiatrists be equipped to harness algorithmic tools responsibly and to translate their outputs into clinically meaningful decisions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, MedicalMental DisordersPsychiatryHumansalgorithmic biasartificial intelligencediagnostic classificationethicsmedical educationpsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID41089865
PMCPMC12515848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.