Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089864›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Associations between health information source and childhood vaccination.

Karly S Geller, Skyler J Montaine-O'Brien, Paul W Branscum, Brandy N Reeves-Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karly S GellerDepartment of Kinesiology, Nutrition, and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Skyler J Montaine-O'BrienCollege of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Paul W BranscumDepartment of Kinesiology, Nutrition, and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Brandy N Reeves-DoyleDepartment of Kinesiology, Nutrition, and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The credibility of health-related information sources may influence parental decisions regarding childhood vaccinations. This study examined whether the type of health information source used by parents (verified vs. unverified) was associated with their child's vaccination outcomes. A national sample of 887 parents (55.1% male; mean age = 36.42 years, standard deviation = 12.29) completed an anonymous online survey. Participants reported demographic characteristics, primary health information sources, and whether their child received 12 vaccine recommendations by the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Health information sources were categorized as primarily from verified (healthcare providers, scientific journals) or unverified (family/friends, social media, opinion blogs). Compared to those using unverified sources, verified source users had significantly higher odds of vaccinating their child across most vaccines, including DTaP, Hib, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, influenza, MMR, MCV4, pneumonia, IPV, and RV (all

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationParentsVaccinationAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInformation SourcesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesparental vaccine concernspediatric immunizationunverified sourcesvaccine misinformationverified health information

Identifiers

PMID41089864
PMCPMC12515898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.