Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089847›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-dysmenorrheal activities of aerial parts of

Pedro Modesto Nascimento Menezes, João Lázaro de Oliveira Rocha, Murilo Soares Silva, Juliane Maria Dos Santos Silva, Tarcísio Cícero de Lima Araújo, Deborah Lays Silva Deus, Pedro Jose Rolim-Neto, Luana Fernandes Matos, Ana Beatriz Rodrigues Massaranduba, Fabrício Souza Silva and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pedro Modesto Nascimento MenezesLaboratório de Farmacologia Experimental (LAFEX), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
João Lázaro de Oliveira RochaLaboratório de Farmacologia Experimental (LAFEX), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Murilo Soares SilvaLaboratório de Farmacologia Experimental (LAFEX), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Juliane Maria Dos Santos SilvaCentral Analítica de Fármacos, Medicamentos e Alimentos (CAFMA), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Tarcísio Cícero de Lima AraújoCentral Analítica de Fármacos, Medicamentos e Alimentos (CAFMA), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Deborah Lays Silva DeusLaboratório de Farmacologia Experimental (LAFEX), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Pedro Jose Rolim-NetoUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Luana Fernandes MatosNúcleo de Estudos em Plantas Medicinais (NEPLAME), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Ana Beatriz Rodrigues MassarandubaPós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde e Biológicas (PGCSB) UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Fabrício Souza SilvaLaboratório de Farmacologia Experimental (LAFEX), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Larissa Araújo RolimCentral Analítica de Fármacos, Medicamentos e Alimentos (CAFMA), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, UNIVASF, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: For this purpose, the police and health authorities provided the raw plant material, and a crude ethanolic extract of the aerial parts of Results: Chemical analysis suggests the presence of classic cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol, tetrahydrocannabinol, and cannabigerol, as well as flavonoids and alkaloids. The doses used in the open field test were 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg (gavage, po), with the last two doses responsible for reducing mobility and inducing hypothermia in the animals. In subsequent pharmacological protocols, the doses used were 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg (gavage, po). In the abdominal contraction model, the number of writhing events was reduced by APCs at a dose of 10 mg/kg [median 0.5 (Q25 = 0; Q75 = 5.75, p < 0.05)]. In the hot plate test, the doses of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg increased the latency time to 17.67 ± 1.33, 18.50 ± 1.31, and 17.33 ± 1.69 s (p < 0.05), respectively. In the formalin test, the effect was restricted to the first phase, with values of 42.33 ± 7.588, 45.50 ± 6.657, and 39.50 ± 7.869 s (p < 0.05) in paw-licking time. In paw edema, the doses of 1 and 3 mg/kg were more constant, restricting the volume to 0.168 ± 0.004 and 0.150 ± 0.004 mL (p < 0.05), respectively. In dysmenorrhea, the doses of 3 and 10 mg/kg reduced abdominal contractions [0 (Q25 = 0; Q75 = 3.0) and 1.0 (Q25 = 0; Q75 = 3.0)]. Conclusion: APCs at the tested doses did not promote an antipyretic effect. These data indicate that APCs have antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-dysmenorrheal effects in animal models.

Indexed as

chemical analysisentourage effectethnopharmacologymarijuanapreclinical study

Identifiers

PMID41089847
PMCPMC12516079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.