ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
Development and validation of a generalisable survival model to predict osteoarthritis progression.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a transfer-learning survival model to predict progression end-stage knee osteoarthritis (esKOA) or receive knee replacement (KR). Method: A DeepSurv model was trained on the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset with baseline clinical variables, including age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, smoking status, prior knee injury and surgery, pain medication use, use of walking aids, and activity level (9560 knees). A generalisable model was then developed by fine-tuning the OAI-derived model with data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) Centre 1 (3002 knees). This model was validated on an independent dataset from MOST Centre 2 (2972 knees). Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index from 1000 bootstrap resamples. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to assess changes in feature importance after fine-tuning. Results: The OAI-derived model performed well within OAI (C-index = 0.75) but fairly on MOST Centre 1 (C-index = 0.61, Conclusion: Transfer learning enabled the development of a generalised model for knee OA prognosis that performs consistently across cohorts. By adapting to population-specific risk patterns, this approach enhances model generalisability and reduces bias from ethnic or demographic overrepresentation in training datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.