ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Two separate episodes of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a patient with familial spontaneous coronary artery dissection background: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a potentially life-threatening condition in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Individuals with a family history of SCAD are rare, and genetic testing in monozygotic twin sisters has not been previously reported. Case summary: This case report describes a 51-year-old woman presenting with signs of ACS. Three years prior to the present admission, she was diagnosed with SCAD in the right coronary artery. The recent episode, precipitated by intense emotional stress, resulted in a dissection of the left circumflex artery, complicated by in-hospital cardiac arrest. The patient underwent conservative management, and a secondary prophylactic, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted before discharge. At follow-up, computed tomography angiography showed features indicative of fibromuscular dysplasia, but genetic testing for possible hereditary connective tissue or syndromic conditions showed no abnormalities. The patient's fraternal aunt has a history of SCAD. Furthermore, the patient has a monozygotic twin sister who prior to her death was diagnosed with SCAD on three separate occasions. Previous genetic investigations were normal. The sister died recently due to her third SCAD event. Discussion: While a thorough clinical assessment for rare connective tissue disorders is required for all SCAD patients, the present case indicates that evaluation with broader genetic panels is needed in patients with recurrent or familial SCAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.