ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Machine Learning Approach on Predictive Model Establishment for In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Solutions for Databases With Dimensionality Reduction and Class Imbalance.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning redevelopment of GRACE, ACEF, and TIMI scores for 6-month mortality.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a leading cause of mortality and disability globally. Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly reduced in-hospital mortality (IHM), the resultant class imbalance complicates accurate risk prediction. While machine learning (ML) demonstrates potential in predicting IHM, there is a lack of models that provide both high accuracy and personalized risk assessment. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. We employed three data processing methods: synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), Boruta, and grid search cross-validation (GSCV). Subsequently, six ML algorithms were implemented. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, precision, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Results: The study cohort consisted of 1693 patients diagnosed with AMI, of whom 34 (2.0%) experienced IHM following PCI. After employing SMOTE to balance the dataset, 32 independent risk factors were identified using the Boruta feature selection method. Among the evaluated ML models, ensemble algorithms demonstrated superior performance. For instance, the Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM) framework achieved a predictive accuracy with an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.00) and an AUPRC of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.17-0.96). Additional performance metrics included an accuracy of 0.988, a precision of 0.625, a sensitivity of 0.625, a specificity of 0.994, and an F1-score of 0.625. Conclusion: Utilizing SMOTE for class balancing, Boruta for feature selection, GSCV for optimal hyperparameter tuning, and LightGBM for model development achieved strong predictive performance for IHM following AMI. These findings underscore the significance of robust processing and careful algorithm selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.