SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Cardiac Function and Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Coronary Heart Disease Patients Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease combined with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Exercise After Coronary Stenting: Potential Effects on in-Stent Restenosis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Comparative Systematic Review of Home-Based and Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation of Delivery Models and Outcomes.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Assessment of the influence of the five central cardiac rehabilitation (CR) prescriptions on heart function and cardiovascular complications in individuals with coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid full-text journals database, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CNKI, VIP, SinoMed, and Wanfang data resources, was performed in November 2024. Studies that met the following criteria were included: (i) Population (P): adult individuals (18 years or older) with a confirmed diagnosis of ischemic heart disease using the clinical gold standard "coronary angiography" and undergoing first-time PCI; (ii) Intervention (I): five core cardiac rehabilitation prescriptions; (iii) Control (C): routine rehabilitation guidance/traditional rehabilitation guidance; (iv) Outcomes (O): left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)/six-minute walk distance (6MWD)/Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE); (v) Study design (S): randomized controlled trials. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials (involving 1808 patients) demonstrates that comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation (CCR), integrating exercise training, nutritional counseling, smoking cessation support, psychological intervention, and medication management, yields two key benefits for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients following first-time PCI: (1) significant enhancement of cardiac function evidenced by improved LVEF (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33 to 0.79), reduced LVEDD (SMD = -0.67, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.36), and increased exercise capacity (SMD = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.15); (2) substantial reduction in MACE (odds ratios (OR) = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.24). Conclusions: Patients who have undergone first-time PCI for CHD may experience significant advantages from the combined intervention of five CR strategies. Along with adherence to medical therapy and the evolution of medical models, strengthening multidisciplinary cooperation is crucial for optimizing clinical outcomes in patients following coronary interventional procedures. The PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024565139, URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024565139.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.