ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Association Between Life's Essential 8 Scores and Heart Failure: Insights From NHANES (2007-2020).
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart Failure in Focus: Acute Presentation, Risk Factors and Integration of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Association between triglyceride-glucose index and related indicators with heart failure-related mortality in individuals with early-stage cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major public health concern due to the associated high morbidity, mortality, and growing economic burden. Thus, early prevention and identification of modifiable risk factors are crucial to reducing the prevalence of HF. The American Heart Association has recently introduced the Life's Essential 8 (LE8) metrics, which offer a comprehensive framework for assessing cardiovascular health. This research aims to investigate the association between the LE8 metrics and the prevalence of HF among the American population, exploring whether the LE8 metrics are associated with HF prevalence and can contribute to the risk stratification of HF in public health settings. Method: The present cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2020, including participants aged ≥20 years with complete data on HF and the LE8 metrics. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between LE8 and the prevalence of HF. Subgroup analyses combined with interaction tests were utilized to investigate potentially affecting factors. Furthermore, the dose-response association was analyzed using smooth curve fitting, while the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to examine the predictive performance of the LE8 metrics in HF patients. Results: A dose-response reverse linear association was identified between the LE8 scores and HF prevalence within the American population. When comparing the group with the lowest LE8 score to that with the highest score, the latter exhibited a 70% decrease regarding HF prevalence (odds ratio (OR) = 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-0.43; Conclusion: Higher LE8 scores were associated with a lower prevalence of HF, suggesting that the LE8 metrics may be a useful tool for identifying at-risk individuals in population health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.