SynthesisThe breast journal2025
Nipple Areolar Complex (NAC) Neurotization After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Synthesis in The breast journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nipple-areolar complex neurotization in implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Hot Topics in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) preserves the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) with superior aesthetic results but results in loss of nipple sensation. Nipple neurotization has emerged as a technique to restore the sensory function, yet outcomes remain variable across studies. This systematic review synthesizes the available evidence on nipple neurotization in IBBR, focusing on sensory recovery, patient satisfaction, and surgical techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched through April 1, 2025, for studies evaluating nipple neurotization in IBBR. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series reporting surgical technique, sensory, and/or patient satisfaction outcomes. Data extraction included study characteristics, surgical techniques, sensory outcomes, and patient-reported satisfaction. Risk of bias was assessed using standardized tools. Results: Six studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 212 patients and 257 neurotized breasts. Sensory recovery was assessed using monofilament testing and patient-reported outcomes. Studies demonstrated overall improvement of NAC sensory outcomes and high patient satisfaction after neurotization. However, variability in neurotization methods, follow-up duration, and specific measured sensory outcomes limited direct comparisons. Conclusion: Nipple neurotization in IBBR shows promise in enhancing sensory recovery and patient satisfaction after NSM, but heterogeneity in surgical techniques and outcome measures, as well as poor study designs, limits definitive conclusions. Standardized protocols and randomized studies with long-term patient follow-up are needed to establish best practices and optimize neurotization outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.