ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
Smart biomaterials in restorative dentistry: Recent advances and future perspectives.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07598305 (Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Smart Bioactive Self-Curing Composite for Cervical Restorations in Profession-al Ballet Dancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Smart Bioactive Self-Curing Composite for Cervical Restorations in Profession-al Ballet Dancers: A 24-Month Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Smart Bioactive Self-Curing Composite for Cervical Restorations in Professional Ballet Dancers: A 24-Month Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Nano-warfare in the oral cavity: antimicrobial strategies and mechanisms in nanodentistry.Odontology · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- The Influence of Ageing and Hydrothermal Fatigue (Thermocycling) on Degradation and Fracture Toughness of Light-Cured and Hybrid Resin-Based Nanocomposites (RBCs).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Modern Drug Delivery Platforms Based on Photocrosslinkable Hydrogels (PCHs) in Dentistry: From Material Characteristics to Clinical Applications-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advanced Biomaterials for Restorative Dentistry: From Biocompatibility to Bioactive and Smart Materials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dental caries beyond eradication: microbiome centered and equilibrium driven therapeutic strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Next-Gen Restorative Materials to Revolutionise Smiles.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of microleakage and internal voids in class II restorations using open sandwich technique: AnBioinformation · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart biomaterials in restorative dentistry are engineered to detect and respond to diverse physiological and environmental stimuli, including mechanical stress, pH fluctuations, temperature changes, and magnetic or electrical fields. Unlike conventional inert restorative materials, these intelligent systems integrate both diagnostic and therapeutic functions into clinical practice. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in smart restorative materials using a methodology that combines literature-based classification with comparative evaluation. The materials are categorized into nanocomposites, hydrogels, bioactive agents, chemical and resin-based systems, intelligent carrier platforms, and ceramic-based materials. For each category, we examine design strategies, underlying mechanisms, and representative experimental or preclinical findings. The analysis highlights progress in drug delivery, antibacterial-remineralization coupling, self-healing capacity, and tissue engineering applications. In addition, the review outlines the advantages and limitations of each material class, evaluates their readiness for clinical translation, and identifies technical barriers to widespread adoption. Finally, future research directions are discussed, including multi-stimulus coupling, bioinspired functionalization, and integration with digital dentistry technologies. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive methodological and developmental perspective on smart restorative materials, with the goal of supporting their translation from laboratory innovation to clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.