Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089722›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025

Smart biomaterials in restorative dentistry: Recent advances and future perspectives.

Jianpeng Sun, Jingang Jiang, Zhiyuan Huang, Xuefeng Ma, Tao Shen, Jie Pan, Zhuming Bi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07598305 (Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Smart Bioactive Self-Curing Composite for Cervical Restorations in Profession-al Ballet Dancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07598305 nacompletednot on this map

Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Smart Bioactive Self-Curing Composite for Cervical Restorations in Profession-al Ballet Dancers: A 24-Month Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsBallet Dancers, Caries, CervicalArmsPolymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) - carious, Polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) - abfraction, Self-curing bioactive bulk-fill composite - carious, Self-curing bioactive bulk-fill composite - abfraction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Next-Gen Restorative Materials to Revolutionise Smiles.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianpeng SunKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Ministry of Education, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150080, China.
Jingang JiangKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Ministry of Education, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150080, China.
Zhiyuan HuangState Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China.
Xuefeng MaKey Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China.
Tao ShenKey Laboratory of Engineering Dielectrics and Its Application, Ministry of Education, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150080, China.
Jie PanPeking University School of Stomatology, Peking, 100081, China.
Zhuming BiPurdue University Northwest, Hammond, 46323, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart biomaterials in restorative dentistry are engineered to detect and respond to diverse physiological and environmental stimuli, including mechanical stress, pH fluctuations, temperature changes, and magnetic or electrical fields. Unlike conventional inert restorative materials, these intelligent systems integrate both diagnostic and therapeutic functions into clinical practice. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in smart restorative materials using a methodology that combines literature-based classification with comparative evaluation. The materials are categorized into nanocomposites, hydrogels, bioactive agents, chemical and resin-based systems, intelligent carrier platforms, and ceramic-based materials. For each category, we examine design strategies, underlying mechanisms, and representative experimental or preclinical findings. The analysis highlights progress in drug delivery, antibacterial-remineralization coupling, self-healing capacity, and tissue engineering applications. In addition, the review outlines the advantages and limitations of each material class, evaluates their readiness for clinical translation, and identifies technical barriers to widespread adoption. Finally, future research directions are discussed, including multi-stimulus coupling, bioinspired functionalization, and integration with digital dentistry technologies. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive methodological and developmental perspective on smart restorative materials, with the goal of supporting their translation from laboratory innovation to clinical application.

Indexed as

Bioactive materialsDental restorative materialsDrug delivery vehiclesHydrogelsNACPsSmart materials

Identifiers

PMID41089722
PMCPMC12517093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.