ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2025
Evaluation of Advanced Endoscopic Stents for Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage: A 2-Year Study.
Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is the first line choice for treatment of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). This study evaluated the technical success, clinical success, and adverse events (AE) associated with the Hot AXIOS electrocautery-enhanced LAMS for pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 45 patients with PPs undergoing Hot AXIOS stent placement between 2019 and 2021. Clinical and technical success were assessed. AEs were graded based on severity and timing. Survival analysis and the Kaplan-Meier curve were used in the study. Results: Technical success was achieved in 97.78% (44/45) cases and clinical success in 95.56% (43/45). Patients with a previous history of PP intervention were significantly more likely to experience moderate to severe AE ( Conclusion: Hot AXIOS stents demonstrated high clinical and technical success rates for PP drainage. Patients with a history of prior interventions for PPs were at significantly higher risk of AE. Closer monitoring is recommended in patients with delayed removal. Future studies should incorporate a multicenter design and control groups with standardized success rates and AE definitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.