ArticleERJ open research2025
Evaluation of a screening protocol for telomere biology disorders in individuals with interstitial lung disease undergoing lung transplant evaluation.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Proposed Clinical Diagnostic Framework for Short Telomere Syndrome.Clinical genetics · 2026Review
- Hematological complications in solid organ transplant recipients with telomere biology disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Because of the potential for extrapulmonary disease, it is important for lung transplant programmes to identify telomere biology disorder (TBD)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). The aim of this study was to evaluate a TBD phenotype screen among ILD patients undergoing lung transplant evaluation, including the sensitivity and specificity of individual phenotype screening questions and the characteristics of patients with TBD identified outside of the screening protocol. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with ILD who underwent lung transplant evaluation from 1 January 2018 to 28 February 2023. The TBD phenotype screen included early greying, family history of ILD and unexplained liver disease, cytopenias or macrocytosis. TBD screen-positive patients underwent telomere length (TL) testing. Results: Among 383 patients evaluated, 92 (24.0%) had a positive phenotype screen. 58 (63.0%) had early greying, 39 (42.4%) had a first-degree relative with ILD and 29 (31.5%) had unexplained macrocytosis or cytopenias. Using granulocyte and lymphocyte TL <10th percentile, 51 (55.4%) patients met criteria for a TBD. Early greying had the highest sensitivity for TBD (72.5%) with specificity increasing with the number of positive screening questions. Among the 23 patients who underwent TL testing outside of the screening protocol, most commonly because of an early age of onset of ILD, eight (34.8%) had TL between the 1st and 10th percentile. Conclusions: Lymphocyte and granulocyte TL <10th is common among TBD phenotype screen-positive ILD patients undergoing transplant evaluation. Inclusion of additional screening questions related to age of onset of ILD could improve the sensitivity of the protocol for short TL.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.