ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Effects of short-duration spaceflight on the execution of critical mission tasks.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to investigate how short-duration spaceflight affects private astronauts' performance of mission-critical functional tasks that challenge balance and locomotor control systems shortly after they return to Earth. Methods: Ten astronauts were assessed while they performed three functional tests (sit-to-stand, tandem walk, and walk-and-turn) before spaceflight and a few hours after returning from missions lasting from 4 to 21 days. Their performance was compared to that of 36 astronauts who returned from long-duration missions lasting from 6 to 12 months. Results: Shortly after return from a short-duration spaceflight, astronauts had difficulty standing, walking, and turning around obstacles, and they experienced terrestrial readaptation motion sickness. However, the performance of these functional tasks was less impacted after short-duration missions than after long-duration missions. After long-duration spaceflight, astronauts took longer to stabilize when standing, made fewer correct steps in balance tests (especially with eyes closed), needed more time for walking tasks, and turned more slowly than after short-duration flight. Motion sickness ratings were more variable and often higher in the long-duration group. Conclusion: Similar to long-duration spaceflight, short-duration missions can also result in significant postflight vestibular and sensorimotor impairments, potentially affecting the ability of some crewmembers to perform critical mission tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.