ReviewHealth science reports2025
Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring: An Umbrella Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative identification of a left non-recurrent laryngeal nerve by neuromonitoring: a critical anatomical finding-case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- [D-wave-guided navigation in spinal cord surgery: From monitoring to decision-making].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) plays a crucial role in several surgical procedures. This study aimed to review the safety and efficacy evidence of IONM technology. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science core collection, Embase, and Cochrane library. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing clinical outcomes, safety, and diagnostic accuracy in patients undergoing neurosurgery with and without IONM were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI tool. The present umbrella review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Results: A total of 48 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in this study. The evidence demonstrated that IONM is clinically effective in reducing the risk of temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and overall recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after thyroidectomy. Moreover, the use of IONM during aneurysm surgery was associated with fewer neurological complications. In carotid endarterectomy surgery, the combined assessment of electroencephalogram (EEG) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) as warning criteria exhibited higher sensitivity compared to EEG or SSEP alone. Notably, bispectral index (BIS)-guided anesthesia did not show a reduction in consciousness risk. In procedures such as spinal, cervical, tumor resection, lumbar surgery, and deformity correction surgeries, IONM techniques demonstrated relative sensitivity in detecting surgery-related nerve damage. Conclusion: Due to the heterogeneity in study types, variable warning thresholds, and limited strong clinical evidence, the efficacy of IONM remains uncertain and necessitates further investigation in this field. Future prospective studies and large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish a definitive conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.