Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089464›Full record

ReviewTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2025

Prevalence of Alloimmunization and Associated Risk Factors among Antenatal Women in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shamee Shastry, Deepika Chenna, Soumya Das, Vinu Rajendran, Mohandoss Murugesan, Rajendra Chaudhary

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. "Baby You're Just Not Right for Me": The Various Problems of Feto-Maternal Incompatibilities.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shamee ShastryDepartment of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Deepika ChennaDepartment of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Soumya DasDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
Vinu RajendranSri Chitra Tirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India.
Mohandoss MurugesanDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Malabar Cancer Centre - Postgraduate Institute of Oncology Sciences and Research, Thalassery, India.
Rajendra ChaudharyDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Maternal alloimmunization can lead to significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. The rate of maternal alloimmunization reported is varied across the studies conducted in India. A systematic review will help in understanding the overall prevalence of alloimmunization. Additionally, the study aimed at understanding the factors affecting the rate of maternal alloimmunization. Methods: A search of original articles reporting rate of alloimmunization among antenatal women published in English language from India was performed in Scopus, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases. Two independent teams, each comprising two reviewers, extracted data from the eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed for cumulative estimates by binary random-effects model using the restricted maximum likelihood method. Results: Fourteen studies published between 2011 and 2023 were included. The pooled prevalence of maternal alloimmunization was 2.0 per 100 (95% CI: 1.5-2.5) among antenatal women, with significant heterogeneity across studies. Anti-D was the most frequently identified antibody (56.39%), followed by anti-D + anti-C (10.68%) and anti-E (5.71%). Higher risk of alloimmunization was observed in women with Rhesus D-negative blood group, multigravida status, history of blood transfusion, and bad obstetric history. Conclusion: Despite the availability of anti-D prophylaxis, over half of the alloimmunized women had anti-D antibodies, indicating potential gaps in prevention strategies. Further research is needed to understand these gaps and implement effective interventions to minimize this preventable cause of fetal and neonatal complications. For girls and women of reproductive age, providing prohylactic antigen-matched (Rh and Kell) red cell units when transfusion is needed may reduce the burden of red cell alloimmunization.

Indexed as

AntibodiesBlood groupReproductive healthTransfusionWomen

Identifiers

PMID41089464
PMCPMC12517677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.