ArticleTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2025
Digital Dialogs on Rhesus Incompatibility: A Thematic Analysis of Web-Based Parental Narratives.
Article in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Baby You're Just Not Right for Me": The Various Problems of Feto-Maternal Incompatibilities.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Feto-maternal incompatibilities such as rhesus (Rh) (D) alloimmunization remain a critical cause of neonatal morbidity despite advances in prevention. While anti-D prophylaxis has significantly reduced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, confusion, emotional distress, and misinformation persist. This study aimed to explore how parents interpret and respond to Rh incompatibility through web-based discussions, highlighting concerns, misconceptions, and informational needs. Methods: A qualitative, inductive thematic analysis was conducted on 312 publicly available posts from Reddit, Facebook groups, YouTube comments, and parenting forums (2018-2024). Posts were retrieved using systematic keyword searches and included if they addressed Rh incompatibility, anti-D prophylaxis, or related interventions. Two researchers independently coded the data using NVivo, and themes were developed iteratively. Results: Six major themes emerged: (1) risk perceptions (uncertainty about fetal harm), (2) emotional burden (anxiety, guilt, confusion), (3) understanding anti-D (misconceptions about timing and purpose), (4) treatment confusion (misunderstanding phototherapy and transfusions), (5) doctor-patient trust gaps, and (6) community misinformation (conspiracy theories and anecdotal remedies). Many users reported inadequate explanations from providers and turned to online forums for clarity - often encountering conflicting or incorrect information. Conclusion: Web-based narratives map parental anxieties and highlight the need for improved digital health communication. Clinicians and health systems should develop culturally sensitive, web-compatible educational strategies to guide expectant parents toward reliable information and reduce misinformation-driven risk. Cultural references, especially from Turkish-language forums, should be interpreted cautiously in light of contextual and linguistic nuances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.