ArticleGBMN Georgian biomedical news
A Qualitative Study Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Smoke-free Homes in Georgia.
Article in GBMN Georgian biomedical news. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adapting a brief smoke-free homes intervention for communities in Armenia and Georgia.Health promotion international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Georgia is a middle-income country with high male smoking rates and recently implemented public smoke-free policies. In contexts like Georgia, smoke-free homes (SFHs) can play crucial roles in reducing secondhand smoke exposure and use prevalence. Objectives: This study examined barriers and facilitators to SFHs among Georgian adults. Methods: In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted separately with smoking and nonsmoking adults in 2 rural communities (n=25; Mage=42.92, 52.0% female, 48.0% married). Data were examined using thematic analysis. Results: Smoking participants (n=13) were primarily (84.6%) male; nonsmoking participants (n=12) were primarily (91.7%) female. Despite 72.2% reporting complete SFH restrictions, several exceptions and implementation challenges were noted. Smoking was commonly allowed for certain people (e.g., guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g., kitchen, balcony). Salient challenges included prevalent male smoking, difficulty changing behavior (smoking in general and smoking in the home), noncompliance, and accommodating guests, older extended family members, and important traditions and celebrations. However, important SFH motives were the health of non-smokers, particularly children, and serving as good role models for children. Conclusions: Effective SFH interventions for Georgian households must address specific characteristics (e.g., high male smoking rates, hospitality, accommodating important traditions) and may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.