ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
The future of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in spinal surgery.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Best Practice Guidelines for the Execution of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spine Deformity Surgery.Spine deformity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preface: On behalf of the NASS section on intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), we present a narrative perspective exploring the future of IONM in spine surgery in the US, drawing on current evidence and future projections. Present state: IONM is used during hundreds of thousands of spinal procedures each year to enhance patient safety via real-time neurodiagnostic feedback. The most common service model is an in-room technologist and a remote supervising professional who interprets the neurophysiological data. The primary goal of IONM is to: (1) detect significant signal changes from baseline, (2) identify the cause-whether technical, positional, anesthetic, or iatrogenic, and (3) pinpoint the site of injury. This diagnostic process is time-sensitive, complex, and dependent on both the signal pattern change and patient and procedural factors that are dynamically variable. Future integrating and advancing technology: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) hold promise to enhance the accuracy in detecting and interpreting signal changes for IONM clinicians and be integrated into surgeon-directed software platforms. However, widespread AI/ML adoption depends on the availability of large, validated IONM datasets-currently hindered by practice variation, inconsistent perioperative documentation, and unharmonized IONM, anesthetic, surgical, and patient medical records. Future maturation in Profession: IONM can improve in the consistency in which optimal IONM is delivered, how IONM is utilized with evidence-based planning for alerts, and the collection of harmonized and complete signal and clinical records. Most publications have focused on the diagnostic accuracy of IONM in predicting deficits, but more emphasis is needed on demonstrating the therapeutic impact of interventions to alerts and their role in preventing new deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.