Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089354›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2025

Nutritional assessment of pork versus chicken as primary protein sources in canine diets.

Sang-Yeob Lee, Kangmin Seo, In-Seon Bae, Hyun-Woo Cho, Min Young Lee, Kyoung Min So, Ju Lan Chun, Ki Hyun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sang-Yeob LeeAnimal Welfare Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8024-1135
Kangmin SeoIngredient Examination Diversion, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Gimcheon 39660, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-8536
In-Seon BaeAnimal Resources Food Tech Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-8785
Hyun-Woo ChoAnimal Welfare Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-9952
Min Young LeeAnimal Welfare Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4860-6290
Kyoung Min SoAnimal Welfare Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9497-3345
Ju Lan ChunAnimal Welfare Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4618-586X
Ki Hyun KimAcademic-Industrial Cooperation Organization, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-2126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protein content of pet food affects its metabolizable energy content and palatability. Although pork is a high-quality protein source, it is not commonly used in pet food due to the lack of verification of its potential as a primary protein source. Hence, in this study, the potential of pork as a protein source in pet food was verified through digestibility testing involving beagle dogs. A pork-based diet made from pork hind legs and a chicken-based diet were provided to 12 beagle dogs. The palatability and digestibility of nutrients of the pork-based diet were compared with those of the chicken-based diet. The results showed that the palatability and apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients (dry matters, crude fat, crude ash, nitrogen-free extract, and amino acids) of the pork-based diet were similar to those of the chicken-based diet. This study suggests that pork hind legs can be used as a protein source in dog food.

Indexed as

Apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD)ChickenDog foodPet foodPorkProtein sources

Identifiers

PMID41089354
PMCPMC12516581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.