ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Effect of basic psychological satisfaction needs on resilience in patients with first acute myocardial infarction: the mediating role of family resilience and hope.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychological resilience is key to coping with adversity, stress buffering, and trauma. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a major life event, triggers severe psychological stress, especially in first-time patients facing heightened adversity. This diminishes resilience and worsens the prognosis. Evidence links basic psychological need satisfaction to resilience, but the mediating roles of family resilience and hope remain untested. This study aimed to explore the influence of psychological satisfaction needs on the psychological resilience of patients with first-time AMI, and to investigate the chain intermediary role of family resilience and hope in it. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2023 to June 2025. Patients with first-time AMI and treated at our hospital were enrolled via convenience sampling. Data were collected using Basic Psychological Needs Scales (BPNS), Basic Psychological Needs Scales (BPNS), Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS) and the Herth Hope Index (HHI). Statistical analysis included an independent sample T test, Pearson correlation analysis, linear regression and self-help intermediary analysis. Results: A total of 179 first-time AMI patients showed mean scores of (62.95 ± 5.71) on the CD-RISC, (110.35 ± 14.00) on the BPNS, (37.28 ± 9.87) on the FRAS, and (24.63 ± 5.93) on the HHI. Significant positive correlations were observed between CD-RISC scores and BPNS, FRAS, and HHI scores (P < 0.05). The total effect of basic psychological needs satisfaction on psychological resilience was significant (β = 0.273, P < 0.001), with a significant direct predictive effect. Basic psychological needs satisfaction positively predicted family resilience (β = 0.489, P < 0.001) and hope (β = 0.262, P < 0.001). Both family resilience (β = 0.211, P < 0.001) and hope (β = 0.273, P < 0.001) demonstrated significant positive effects on psychological resilience. Path analysis confirmed four significant mediation pathways (all 95% CIs excluded zero). Conclusion: Family resilience and hope mediate basic psychological needs and psychological resilience in first-time AMI patients. Clinical care should integrate family-community resources to enhance social support and companionship, aiming to boost patients' resilience and promote prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.