Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089291›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

LLM evaluation for thyroid nodule assessment: comparing ACR-TIRADS, C-TIRADS, and clinician-AI trust gap.

Xi Dai, Yu Xi, Yong Hu, Qingyan Ding, Yu Zhang, Hui Liu, Piaofei Chen, Xi Wang, Wenjun Wang, Chaoxue Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xi DaiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yu XiDepartment of Endocrinology, Huangshan City People's Hospital, Huangshan, Anhui, China.
Yong HuDepartment of Thyroid, Breast and Hernia Surgery, Huangshan City People's Hospital, Huangshan, Anhui, China.
Qingyan DingDepartment of Ultrasound, Huangshan City People's Hospital, Huangshan, Anhui, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Huangshan City People's Hospital, Huangshan, Anhui, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Huangshan City People's Hospital, Huangshan, Anhui, China.
Piaofei ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Huangshan City People's Hospital, Huangshan, Anhui, China.
Xi WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Huangshan City People's Hospital, Huangshan, Anhui, China.
Wenjun WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Huangshan City People's Hospital, Huangshan, Anhui, China.
Chaoxue ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of advanced large language models (LLMs) -GPT-4o, GPT-o3-mini, and DeepSeek-R1- in stratifying thyroid nodule malignancy risk and generating guideline-aligned management recommendations based on structured narrative ultrasound descriptions. Methods: This diagnostic modeling study evaluated three LLMs-GPT-4o, GPT-o3-mini, and DeepSeek-R1-using standardized narrative ultrasound descriptors. These descriptors were annotated by consensus among three senior board-certified sonologists and processed independently in a stateless manner to ensure unbiased outputs. LLM outputs were assessed under both ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS frameworks. Two experienced clinicians (a thyroid surgeon and an endocrinologist) independently rated the outputs across five clinical dimensions using 5-point Likert scales. Primary outcomes included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for malignancy prediction, and clinician ratings of guideline adherence, patient safety, operational feasibility, clinical applicability, and overall performance. Results: GPT-4o achieved the highest predictive AUC (0.898) under C-TIRADS, approaching expert-level accuracy. DeepSeek-R1, particularly with C-TIRADS, received the highest clinician ratings (mean Likert: surgeon 4.65, endocrinologist 4.63), reflecting greater trust in its practical recommendations. Clinicians consistently favored the C-TIRADS framework across all models. GPT-4o and GPT-o3-mini received lower ratings in trustworthiness and recommendation quality, especially from the endocrinologist. Conclusion: While GPT-4o demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy, clinicians most trusted DeepSeek-R1 combined with the C-TIRADS framework for generating practical, guideline-consistent recommendations. The findings highlight the critical need for alignment between AI-generated outputs and clinician expectations, and the importance of incorporating region-specific clinical guidelines (like C-TIRADS) for the effective real-world implementation of LLMs in thyroid nodule management decision support.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicTrustUltrasonographyACR-TIRADSclinical decision-makingC-TIRADSlarge language models (LLMs)risk stratificationthyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID41089291
PMCPMC12515656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.