Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41089246›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Cardiometabolic shock: understanding the final turns of the downward spiral.

Tobin Mathew, Jin Kyung Kim, Michael A Gibson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobin Mathew *Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States.
Jin Kyung Kim *Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States.
Michael A Gibson *Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sutter Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of decreased cardiac output leading to systemic hemodynamic collapse and potential end-organ damage with an elevated risk of mortality. CS represents a heterogenous disease state with varying etiologies, severities, and hemodynamics. Several attempts have been made to characterize CS, including the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions shock classification (SCAI), the American Heart Association (AHA) hemodynamic phenotypes, as well as other groups defining shock by underlying clinical factors and pathophysiology. Here, we review cardiometabolic shock, a complex and severe form of CS characterized by severe lactic acidosis and metabolic derangement, systemic inflammation with ischemia/reperfusion injury, persistent vasodilation despite hemodynamic support, and right heart failure, culminating in progressive end-organ failure and a downward spiral of cardiovascular instability. Understanding the components of pathophysiology underlying cardiometabolic shock may help to establish more accurate diagnosis and instituting prompt therapy in the management of this grave cardiac illness. The emerging roles of nitric oxide synthase inhibition, antioxidants, anti-inflammatory agents, proteomics, and artificial intelligence are discussed. Further studies are needed to fully understand cardiometabolic shock and to develop specific effective therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockcardiometabolic shockinflammationlactic acidosismechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID41089246
PMCPMC12515822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.